The Strategic Advance of Brand and Trademark Ownership: A Case Study

The Value of Trademarks in Today’s Market

In today's competitive landscape, owning a trademark transcends legal formalities; it emerges as a strategic asset pivotal for protecting and propelling your business forward. Manufacturers who also own the trademarks for their brands unlock strategic capabilities, notably the ability to dictate terms to resellers. This capacity is especially valuable as it offers a legal avenue to influence product sales and pricing strategies within the bounds of European Union and Czech Republic competition laws.

Navigating Legalities and advantage of Brand and Trademark Ownership over EU and Czech Competition Law

EU and Czech competition laws prohibit direct control over the resale prices set by business partners, a regulation intended to foster fair competition and prevent price fixing. Nonetheless, trademark ownership coupled with strategically structured licensing agreements empowers brands to subtly guide the market presentation and pricing of their products without overstepping legal boundaries.

Case Study: Chanel applying its trademark rights against unlicensed reseller Notino that commodifies its high-end brand

A prime example of strategic trademark use is the legal tussle between Chanel and the Czech e-commerce platform Notino. Chanel's six-year legal battle aimed to force Notino to reveal the sources of its Chanel products, sold without official permission. The High Court in Prague's decision highlights the importance Chanel places on maintaining its brand's exclusivity and value through rigorous reseller standards. This case spotlights the challenges posed by unauthorized reselling and the potential for brand commoditization.

The Outcome: Chanel Enforcing Brand Standards and the Strategic Advance of its Brand and Business Model

This legal confrontation underscores the effectiveness of trademark ownership in upholding brand standards and safeguarding against brand value dilution due to unauthorised distribution. The court's decision affirmed Chanel's right to ascertain the distribution channels of its products, validating the practice of imposing strict conditions on resellers to maintain brand integrity.

Strategic Implications for Businesses

The Chanel vs. Notino conflict illustrates the profound strategic benefits of trademark ownership. It enables brands to meticulously control their narrative, ensuring that their representation in the market is consistent with their ethos and quality standards. For companies aiming to protect their brand and successfully navigate complex market dynamics, leveraging the strategic potential of trademarks is paramount.

The Interconnection of Brand & Trademark and Business Strategy

Building your brand and formulating your business strategy are processes that should be executed concurrently. Ignoring the integration of your brand identity with your business strategy can result in disjointed efforts, failing to engage your audience or meet your business goals. A holistic approach guarantees that every facet of your brand aligns with and bolsters your strategic objectives, crafting a unified and persuasive story that fosters growth and success.

Book a discovery call